Annex 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

City of York Council

Annual Complaints Report

April 2021 – March 2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bryn Roberts

Director of Governance and Monitoring Officer

Cath Murray

Corporate Governance Operational Manager (which includes Designated Complaints Officer for children’s social care complaints and Complaints Manager for adult social care complaints).


 

Index                                                                                                                  

 

Title                                                                                                  Section

Introduction                                                                                               1

Ombudsman Investigations and Annual Review Letter                          2

What is a complaint                                                                                  3

Effectiveness of the Procedures                                                              4

Themes                                                                                                     5

Cost of delivering the complaints procedure                                           6

 

Children’s Social Care Complaints

Context                                                                                                      7

Who can make a complaint                                                                      8

Grading of Complaints                                                                             9

Activity                                                                                                       10

Total Complaints Made                                                                             11

Comparison with the preceding year                                                       12

Outcomes of complaints                                                                           13

Response Times                                                                                       14

Stage One                                                                                                 15

Stage Two                                                                                                 16

Stage Three                                                                                              17

Percentage Escalation                                                                             18

Equalities Monitoring Information                                                             19

Who made the complaints                                                                       20

Costs and Payments                                                                                21

Alternative Dispute Resolution                                                                 22

Learning Lessons/Practice Improvements                                              23

 

Adult Social Care Complaints

Context                                                                                                      24

Who can make a complaint                                                                      25

Grading of Complaints                                                                             26

Activity                                                                                                       27

Comparison with the preceding year                                                       28

Outcomes of complaints                                                                           29

Response Times                                                                                       30

Green                                                                                                        31

Amber                                                                                                        32

Red                                                                                                            33

Equalities Monitoring Information                                                             34

Who made the complaints                                                                       35

Payments                                                                                                  36

Alternative Dispute Resolution                                                                 37

Complaints dealt with by The Local Authority and NHS Bodies            38

Learning Lessons/Practice Improvements                                              39

 

Public Health                                                                                           40

 

Corporate Complaints Procedure

Context                                                                                                      41

Who can make a complaint                                                                      42

Grading of Complaints                                                                             43

Response Times                                                                                       44

 

Detail of complaints

Stage One                                                                                                 45

Stage Two                                                                                                 46

Stage Three                                                                                              47

Learning Lessons/Practice Improvements                                              48

Payments                                                                                                  49

Alternative Dispute Resolution                                                                 50

 

Details of LGSCO cases & compliance Report                   Annex 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

1       Introduction

 

Complaints and Feedback are managed for all council areas through the Corporate Governance Team (CGT) to ensure that comments, complaints, concerns, and compliments are dealt with in an independent and consistent way across the council.

 

Complaints about adult and children’s social care services are dealt with under two separate pieces of legislation:

·        The Children Act 1989 Representations Procedure (England) Regulations 2006

·        The Local Authority Social Services and National Health Service Complaints (England) Regulations 2009

 

Complaints about other council services are dealt with under the council’s 4cs procedure for Complaints, Concerns, Comments and Compliments. This procedure was designed using the guidance and good practice specified in the statutory procedures and by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman (LGSCO) and Housing Ombudsman Service (HOS).

 

It is essential that all teams delivering services (including the contractors or providers of services on our behalf) formally capture and record complaints. It is only by doing so that complaints can be tracked and where things have gone wrong, managers can ensure that matters are put right. Senior managers and the CGT therefore regularly encourage teams to recognise complaints and report these to the CGT.

 

Staff continue to work based mainly from home, with some office working, including for team, and training sessions. Staff however continue to be available to attend appropriate venues as needed to complete their work. It is considered these arrangements have a positive impact on service provision, with staff having the flexibility to speak to customers, key staff, and managers, at a time and in a manner convenient to them and appropriate for the circumstances of the contact.

 

It has given team members and senior managers the ability to work more closely to respond to and resolve complaints, with the CGT providing advice to managers about appropriate remedies and responses for managers to then consider and agree or amend.

 

This has resulted in the ability to provide responses to the complainants’ satisfaction more quickly and to provide thorough responses and explanations to explain the council’s actions regardless of whether the complaint is upheld or not.

 

 

 

2       Ombudsman Investigations and Annual Review Letter

 

The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman (LGSCO) is the council’s regulator and following the conclusion of the relevant complaints’ procedure, can investigate complaints about council services.

 

The exception to this is that the Housing Ombudsman Service (HOS) is the regulator for most housing related services and the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is the regulator for all information governance complaints, including complaints about data breaches, and responses to requests under the Data Protection Act, General Data Protection Regulation, Freedom of Information Act and Environmental Information Regulations.

 

The LGSCO provides an annual review letter about the council covering April to March each year. This includes tables presenting the number of complaints and enquiries received about the council and the decisions the LGSCO has made during the reporting period. This is to help us assess our performance in handling complaints. It includes the number of cases where the LGSCO’s recommendations remedied the fault and the number of cases where they decided we had had offered a satisfactory remedy during our local complaints process. In these latter cases the LGSCO provides reassurance that we had satisfactorily attempted to resolve the complaint before the person went to them.

 

The LGSCO received 71 cases about the council in April 2021 to March 2022 with 71 cases being concluded within this time. (This includes cases which may have been received but not concluded in the previous reporting period). Of the 71 cases, 22 were considered as a detailed investigation and of these 19 were upheld.

 

LGSCO Total Decided Cases

 

LGSCO decided cases

2020 - 2021

2021 - 2022

How many?

% Rounded down to whole number

How many?

% Rounded down to whole number

Closed after initial enquiries

17

39%

29

40%

Referred for local resolution

6

14%

14

19%

Advice given

1

2%

4

5%

Incomplete/invalid

1

2%

2

2%

Not upheld – detailed investigations

7

16%

3

4%

Upheld – detailed investigations

12

27%

19

26%

Total

44

 

71

 

 

The LGSCO’s 19 upheld decisions had the following remedies

 

Remedy

 

 

Number

Apology

1

Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble

1

Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, financial redress: Loss of service

1

Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, Financial Redress: Quantifiable Loss

1

Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, Financial Redress: Quantifiable Loss, Procedure, or policy change/review, provide services to person affected

1

Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, new appeal/review, or reconsidered decision

1

Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, provide information/advice to person affected, Procedure or policy change/review

1

Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, Provide training and/or guidance

1

Apology, Financial Redress: Quantifiable Loss

1

Apology, New appeal/review, or reconsidered decision, Provide training and/or guidance

1

Apology, provide information/advice to person affected, Provide training and/or guidance

1

Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble

1

Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, provide services to person affected, provide services/information to others affected

1

No remedy recommended

6

Total

19

 

The details of the 19 upheld cases are shown at Annex 1 at the end of this report.

The points of particular importance in the Ombudsman’s annual letter and published performance from this year are:

 

·         86% of all detailed investigation were upheld. This compares to an average of 64% in similar authorities.  However, when considered from all decided cases it is 26% were upheld

·         In 100% of cases the Ombudsman were satisfied that the authority has successfully implemented their recommendations.  This compares to an average of 99% in similar authorities.

·         In 11% of upheld cases the Ombudsman found the authority had provided a satisfactory remedy before the complaint reached the Ombudsman.  This compares to an average of 12% in similar authorities. In practice this means that although the Ombudsman found there had been fault, the authority had already acknowledged this and provided an appropriate remedy. The aim of the complaints team is to identify and offer appropriate remedies where fault has occurred.

 

Further details from the LGSCO’s annual report with the breakdown of cases they dealt with, and the outcomes found for this reporting period are included at annex 1.

 

In 2021 to 2022 there were 3 cases determined by the HOS.  Of these:

 

·        1 was upheld as service failure without a public report – the council complied with all actions.

·        1 was resolved with early intervention/resolution – the council apologised, completed repairs, and paid £150.00

·        1 was closed as no maladministration

 

3       What is a Complaint?

 

A complaint is an expression of dissatisfaction however made, about the actions, decisions, or apparent failings of a local authority’s social services provision, and/or the level or nature of a council service or policy, which requires a response. If it is possible to resolve the complaint immediately this does not need to be logged through the complaint procedure.

 

A complaint is not a request for a service that is made for the first time. For example, if a customer complains that a streetlight is not working, we will treat it as a service request that we aim to fulfil by repairing it within the service level agreement. If we then fail to repair it within that timescale, and the customer is still unhappy, it should then be defined and treated as a complaint

 

4       Effectiveness of the Procedures

 

The CGT offer and proactively encourage all staff and managers to participate in regular training and awareness raising, about the complaints and feedback procedures.

 

In addition to this, guidance is provided to assist managers in children’s and adult services with completing thorough investigations and comprehensive responses including on a case-by-case basis. We have continued to work with the providers of our independent investigators, who have knowledge and experience of complaints across several authorities to ensure our practice and guidance is effective and appropriate to fulfil our obligations and ensure best practice in complaints handling.

 

When managers in adult and children’s services provide a response to a complaint, they are asked to record what will be done to resolve it, what lessons have been learnt and what action will be taken to improve services and avoid problems being repeated, which is also in place for corporate complaints.  The CGT proactively monitor the completion of both action plans and lessons learned.

 

A summary of the information received regarding the lessons learnt and action taken is included in this report at sections 23, 39 and 48.

 

5       Themes

 

The main themes this year continue to include the quality and timeliness of communication. Several complaints are logged as Lack of Action, where information had not been provided, or calls and requests for contact have not been returned.

 

6       Cost of delivering the complaints procedure including the corporate procedure:

 

There are ongoing costs attached to delivering an efficient and effective complaints service. These costs should be seen against the inherent costs of not providing this service. These may include customer dissatisfaction escalating, an increase in number of and amount awarded as financial remedies being recommended by the LGSCO, increased judicial reviews and non-compliance with legislation.

 

The total actual spends for the full service including the Information Governance provision, salary and on-costs was £363,727.

 

The financial remedies payments made as part of the three different complaints procedures are provided at sections 21, 36 and 49 later of this report.

 

The council must provide investigating officers and independent people for social care complaints where required and the costs for this in this reporting period was £34622 compared to £60424 last year. This includes the core costs for the service provision. It is noted this is significantly lower than the previous year. It is considered this is due to the work to improve the quality and timeliness of responses in children’s services in the previous year. However as this has not been maintained it is anticipated this will increase in the next reporting period.

 

The CGT has however continued to work with the agency and managers to better understand and manage these costs without impacting on the thoroughness or independence of the investigation. This has included looking at improving the efficiency around provision of information and arrangements for interviews with staff.


 

Annual Children’s Social Care Complaints and Representations Report

April 2021 – March 2022

 

7       Context

 

The following information relates to complaints made during the twelve months between 1st April 2021 and 31st March 2022 for children under the Children Act 1989 Representations Procedure (England) Regulations 2006.

 

It is noted there has been an increase in the number of complaints which were responded to late and a number which did not receive a response. This is a concern, and the Corporate Governance Operational Manager (CGOM) is working with managers to return to and build on the improvements made in the previous reporting period.

 

The CGOM has made several requests to be invited to team sessions to provide feedback, lessons learnt and awareness raising. Although the CGOM has been invited to regular meetings with some managers, there has been no response to requests to meet with staff teams in this reporting period. This remains a concern which needs to be addressed, to ensure learning and awareness about the importance of responding appropriately to concerns is shared, to improve customer experience and reduce the need for avoidable complaints and ensure they are dealt with fully, without the need for them to be escalated to a higher stage unnecessarily.

 

The CGGM is now working with the recently appointed Corporate Director and Director of Safeguarding, to ensure awareness and learning can be shared with all staff to make improvements, which it is hoped will be reflected in the next reporting period.

 

All timescales contained within this report are for working days.

 

In addition, the numbers of compliments are also recorded, and these are:

 

Compliments received

 

14/15

15/16

16/17

17/18

18/19

19/20

20/21

21/22

3

23

6

17

22

22

59

21

 

The CGT are aware that many more compliments are received and actively work to encourage staff and teams to forward these to ensure they are recorded.  This is to ensure we can provide an accurate picture of our customers’ experiences of the services they receive.

 

 

The compliments received include:

 

·        Social worker wonderful, quick to answer, sorted out holiday and overnight respite

·        Thanks to social worker for all their support with the family

·        Thanks to worker for all their help with Children in Need and family

·        Thanks, from a judge for all the preparation and hard work on the case

·        Thanks for all the time spent helping the family

·        Thanks for patience, kindness, help and advice

·        Worker great moving things forward, supporting adoption process, valued support & input

·        appreciated wonderful support

·        Thanks for support of foster carer, values support of children as well & detailed feedback in review

 

The legislation makes it clear that people should be able to provide feedback and have this responded to, without this being seen as a complaint. Therefore concerns, comments and requests are also logged.

 

The number of concerns, comments and requests received in this period were:

 

Numbers of Concerns, Comments and Requests

 

14/15

15/16

16/17

17/18

18/19

19/20

20/21

21/22

6

14

11

26

20

33

29

19

 

A concern is logged when someone wants to tell us about a problem, without wanting this to be considered as a complaint.

 

A comment or request is logged when someone suggests, or request. This is then passed to the appropriate person to respond to the issues being raised. If a person remains dissatisfied after receiving a response, this would then be logged as a complaint.

 

8       Who can make a Complaint?

 

·        Any child or young person (or a parent, or someone who has parental responsibility) who is being looked after by the local authority or is not looked after by them but is in need.

·        Any local authority foster carer (including those caring for children placed through independent fostering agencies).

·        Children leaving care

·        Special Guardians

·        A child or young person (or parent) to whom a Special Guardian order is in place.

·        Any person who has applied for an assessment under section 14F (3) or (4).

·        Any child or young person who may be adopted, their parents and guardians.

·        Persons wishing to adopt a child.

·        Any other person whom arrangements for the provision of adoption services extend.

·        Adopted persons, their parents, natural parents and former guardians and such other person as the local authority consider has sufficient interest in the child or young person’s welfare to warrant their representations being considered by them.

 

Where a complaint is received from a representative on behalf of a child or young person, we will, where appropriate, confirm that the child or young person is happy for this to happen and that the complaint received reflects their views.

 

The CGOM in consultation with relevant operational managers will decide whether the person is suitable to act in this capacity and has sufficient interest in the child’s welfare. If it is decided that a person is not suitable to act as a representative for a child, they will be informed of the decision in writing by the CGOM. The complaint will then fall outside the statutory procedure.  They will however be able to complain through the 4Cs corporate complaints procedure.

 

Complaints may also be made by adults relating to a child or young person but are not being made on their behalf. The CGOM in consultation with operational managers will decide whether the person has sufficient interest in the child’s welfare for the complaint to be considered. The child may also be consulted as part of the decision-making process.

 

9       Grading of Complaints

 

Complaints are graded following an assessment of issues including severity, complexity, risk to the customer and other customers, risk to the authority, history of similar complaints and likelihood of future similar complaints. Other considerations include, the outcomes wanted to resolve the complaint, who is best placed to consider and effectively respond to the complaint and the complainant’s views of how the complaint should be dealt with.

 

Stage One. 

 

Is dealt with by line managers of the service area the complaint concerns, this includes where the service is being provided on behalf of the council by an external contractor. The expectation is that the managers will have the knowledge and understanding of the issues and delegated responsibility to be able to resolve complaints at this stage quickly, without the need for an in-depth formal investigation.

 

The legislation requires complaints at stage one to be responded to within 10 working days. This can be extended for a further 10 working days in some circumstances, for example where further time is needed to arrange an advocate, or where staff may be away from work. This can only be extended with the agreement of the complainant.

 

Stage Two.  

 

This stage is implemented where the complainant is dissatisfied with the findings of stage one, or where it is assessed as being appropriate to be considered and responded to at this stage, due to issues including the severity, complexity, or risk.   Stage two requires an investigation conducted by either an internal manager who has not had any previous involvement in the complaint and has no line management responsibility for the area being complained about, or an external investigating officer. The Director of Children’s Safeguarding adjudicates on the findings of the investigation.

 

The council must offer an advocate to assist children and young people in making a complaint and appoint an Independent Person to oversee the investigation process at this stage. Stage two complaints falling within the social services statutory complaints procedures should be dealt with in 25 days, although in certain cases this can be extended to 65 days.

 

Stage Three.  

 

The third stage of the complaints process is the review panel. Where complainants wish to proceed with complaints about statutory social service functions, the council is required to establish a complaints review panel. The panel makes recommendations to the Corporate Director of Children and Education, who then decides and provides a written response on the complaint and any action to be taken.

 

Complaints review panels must be made up of 3 independent panellists. There are various timescales relating to stage three complaints. These are:

 

·        setting up the panel within 30 working days.

·        producing the panel’s report within 5 working days of the panel; and

·        producing the local authority’s response within 15 days following receipt of the report.

 

A further option for complainants is the LGSCO who is empowered to investigate where it appears that a council’s own investigations have not resolved the complaint. Complainants can refer their complaint to the LGSCO at any time, although the Ombudsman normally refers the complaint back to the council, unless the council has been given sufficient opportunity to consider and respond to the complaint.

 

10     Activity

 

The CGT recorded 42 complaints under the children’s social care procedure during the year, compared with a total of 55 last year.

 

An additional 4 complaints were received through the 4Cs corporate complaints procedure, compared to 1 in the previous year.

 

11     Total complaints made:

 

Of the 42 complaints dealt with:

·        31 were investigated at stage one of the social care procedures,

·        3 progressed to stage two, with 1 of these being from the previous reporting period.

·        10 complaints in total heard at stage two with 7 of these being moved straight to stage 2, due to their complexity and or severity.

·        1 complaint was raised at stage 3, but not pursued to the panel.

 

12     Comparison with the preceding year

 

The numbers of complaints being received are small and typically fluctuate each year and this is typical of social care complaints received across Yorkshire and Humberside.   The figures show a decrease of 24% for this reporting period. The reasons for this are noted in the following information.

 

13     Outcomes of Complaints – total

 

 

2017-2018

2018-2019

2019 - 2020

2020 - 2021

2021-2022

Upheld

4

6

19

8

3

Partly upheld

10

19

27

17

11

Not upheld

20

14

12

16

12

Not proved

0

0

2

-

-

Not pursued

2

5

14

9

5

No response

2

-

16

2

9

Ongoing

2

0

1

3

2

Total

40

44

91

55

42

 

14     Response Times

 

A key requirement of complaints procedures is to ensure that individuals are informed of the outcome of their complaints, in an appropriate time frame.

 

The timescales in working days for children’s social care complaints as set out in the regulation are:

 

·        10 days at Stage 1 (with a further 10 days for more complex complaints or additional time if an advocate is required).

·        25 days at Stage 2 (with maximum extension to 65 days).

·        20 days for the complainant to request a Review Panel.

·        30 days to convene and hold the Review Panel at Stage 3.

·        5 days for the Panel to issue its findings: and

·        15 days for the local authority to respond to the findings.

 

Details of Complaints by stage

 

15     Stage One Complaints

 

There were 31 stage one complaints compared to 41 last year.

 

We are pleased to note that as expected the numbers during this reporting period have reduced since the previous year.

 

Although it is not considered receiving larger numbers of complaints is always a negative, because this can show that the procedure is accessible, and customers are supported to make complaints which provide invaluable feedback.

 

These have been categorised as follows:

 

Stage One - Theme of complaint

 

2018 – 2019

2019 - 20

2020 - 21

2021 - 22

Attitude of staff

 

-

-

1

Disagree with Policy

1

-

1

1

Disagree with Assessment

9

13

7

5

Discrimination

1

-

-

-

Inappropriate Action

12

32

10

5

Lack of Action

6

22

9

11

Quality of Advice/

Communication

5

5

14

8

TOTAL

34

72

41

31

 

You will note that the lack of action is the highest theme this year and higher than in previous years. However, this includes failings in communication and this theme remains the highest area of complaint.

 

Stage One - Responding in time performance

 

2017

-

2018

%*

2018

-

2019

%*

2019 - 2020

%*

2020 - 2021

%*

2021 - 2022

%*

Within 10 days

24

80%

17

50%

31

43%

20

49%

11

35%

Within 20 days

5

17%

12

34%

8

11%

6

15%

1

3%

Over 20 days

0

-

1

2%

20

28%

7

17%

16

52%

Not Pursued

1

3%

4

11%

13

18%

8

19%

3

10%

TOTAL

30

 

34

 

72

 

41

 

31

 

*% figures are rounded to the nearest whole number

 

We are concerned about the number of complaints where responses were sent late to the customer and where no response was received by the Corporate Governance Team (CGT) at this stage.

 

We are aware that where the complaint is recorded as no response sent, managers may have responded verbally to customers and not updated the CGT team. It is also possible managers may have sent written responses and not forwarded these to the CGT. It is however of the upmost importance that the CGT are updated with the progress of complaints. This is so that performance in this area can be monitored and reported accurately.

 

The significant objective of complaints is so that actions can be identified to resolve the complaint for the customer and lessons learnt to improve service. The CGT continues to remind managers of the importance of ensuring they are updated on the outcome of complaints and are provided with responses, so that the council can ensure appropriate lessons are learnt, actioned, and reported.


 

Stage One - Outcomes

           

2017

-

2018

%*

2018

-

2019

%*

2019 - 2020

%*

2020 - 2021

%*

2021 - 2022

%*

Upheld

3

10%

3

8%

16

22%

8

19%

3

10%

Partially Upheld

7

23%

14

41%

15

21%

7

17%

7

22%

Not Upheld

16

53%

13

38%

10

14%

16

39%

9

29%

Not Proven

0

-

0

-

2

3%

0

-

0

-

Not Pursued

2

7%

4

11%

13

18%

8

19%

3

10%

No response

2

7%

-

-

16

22%

2

5 %

9

29%

TOTAL

30

 

34

 

72

 

41

 

31

 

*% figures are rounded to the nearest whole number

 

16     Stage Two Complaints

 

Stage Two - Theme of Complaint

 

2017 - 2018

2018 - 2019

2019 - 2020

2020 - 2021

2021 - 2022

Attitude of staff

-

-

-

 

-

Disagree with Policy

-

-

-

-

-

Disagree with Assessment

1

3

6

1

-

Discrimination

-

-

-

-

-

Inappropriate Action

4

3

6

6

4

Lack of Action

3

4

4

2

3

Quality of Advice/

Communication

2

-

1

-

3

TOTAL

10

10

17

9

10

 

Stage Two – Responding in time performance

 

2017

-

2018

%*

2018

-

2019

%*

2019 - 2020

%*

2020 - 2021

%*

2021 - 2022

%*

Within 25days

6

60%

1

10%

3

17%

2

21%

0

-

Within 65 days

0

-

2

20%

3

17%

-

-

0

-

Over timescale

4

40%

6

60%

9

51%

4

44%

7

70%

Not Pursued

0

-

1

10%

1

6%

-

-

1

10%

Ongoing

0

-

-

-

1

6%

3

33%

2

20%

TOTAL

10

 

10

 

17

 

9

 

10

 

 

It is noted for all but the complaint, which was not pursued, all responses at this stage were “over the timescale”. It is important to remember, complaints at this stage are often complex, with several elements and there may also be the need to arrange advocates and appointments with both staff and complainants, particularly at adjudication.

 

It is however noted that many of the responses at this stage in this reporting period, had further delays following the departure of the previous Assistant Director, who would normally have responded to these complaints. This coincided with the Corporate Director post also being vacant. There were then significant difficulties identifying managers to take on the responsibility of the Adjudicating Officer and providing responses. This also impacted on the ability to provide appropriate updates to complainants, and we are aware this led to further upset and frustration for complainants.

 

The importance of keeping complainants up to date especially where there are delays in responding to their complaints, cannot be overstated. The CGT is working with the newly appointed Corporate Director and Director, as well as other managers to ensure this is improved for the current reporting period.

 

Stage Two Outcomes

 

2017 -

2018

%*

2017 -

2018

%*

2019 - 2020

%*

2020 – 2021

%*

2021 - 2022

%*

Upheld

-

 

3

30%

2

12%

-

-

-

 

Partially Upheld

3

30%

5

50%

11

65%

6

67%

4

 

Not Upheld

3

30%

1

10%

2

12%

-

-

3

30%

Not Pursued

2

20%

1

30%

1

6%

-

-

1

10%

No response sent

2

20%

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

 

Ongoing

-

 

-

-

1

6%

3

33%

2

20%

TOTAL

10

 

10

 

17

 

9

 

10

 

 

The CGT continued to work to ensure that complaints at this stage were not forgotten about and responses where provided, regardless of the time this took to achieve.

 

17     Stage Three Complaints

 

There was 1 children’s stage three complaint, compared with 5 in the previous reporting period. It is considered this is because of the improvements in the quality and timeliness of responses made in the previous reporting period and that as these improvements have not continued it is likely the number of stage 3 complaints in the next reporting period will increase.

 

The process at stage three of the Children’s Social Care Complaints Procedure is an independent review panel that will consider whether the investigation, findings, and recommendations at stage two, were thorough, logical, and fair. The Panel then provides a report to the Corporate Director of Children and Education with their conclusions and any recommendations considered appropriate. The Corporate Director would then respond confirming whether they agree with the conclusions and any recommendations made.

 

Stage Three - Theme of Complaint

 

2018 -2019

2019 - 2020

 

2020 - 2021

2021 -2022

Attitude of staff

-

-

-

-

Disagree with Policy

-

-

-

-

Disagree with Assessment

-

-

-

--

Discrimination

-

-

-

 

Inappropriate Action

-

-

4

1

Lack of Action

-

2

1

 

Quality of Advice/

Communication

-

-

-

-

TOTAL

-

-

5

1

 

Stage Three - Responding in time performance

 

2018

-

2019

%*

2019 - 2020

%*

2020 - 2021

%*

2021 - 2022

 

Within 15 days

-

-

1

50%

3

60%

-

-

Over 15 days

-

-

1

50%

1

20%

-

-

Not Pursued

-

-

-

-

1

20%

1

100%

TOTAL

-

-

2

 

5

 

1

 

 

Stage Three Outcomes

 

2018 -

2019

%*

2019 - 2020

%*

2020 - 2021

%*

2021 - 2022

 

Upheld

-

-

1

50%

-

-

-

1

Partially Upheld

-

-

1

50%

4

80%

-

1

Not Upheld

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

1

Not Pursued

-

-

-

 

1

20%

1

100%

No response sent

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

-

Ongoing

-

-

-

 

-

-

-

-

TOTAL

-

-

2

 

5

 

1

 

 

In addition to the information given above for complaints made through the children’s’ social care complaints procedure, 1 complaint was received as a 4cs corporate grade one and three as a corporate grade 2. Complaints are dealt with under the corporate procedure when the complainant is not complaining with the consent of the customer, or it is considered they are not complaining in the customer’s best interest. 

 

18     Percentage escalation

 

The following table indicates how many complaints in children’s services have been escalated. By measuring these figures as a percentage, we can gauge the implied customer satisfaction levels.

 

Percentage escalation

 

Number

% Escalated to next stage

% Implied customer satisfaction

Stage 1 to Stage 2

2 of 31 (1 was from previous reporting period)

6%

94%

Stage 2 to Stage 3

0 of 1(the stage 2 was from the previous reporting period

0%

100%

 

It is important to note that whilst only a small number of complaints have escalated in this reporting period, the implied customer satisfaction needs to be considered alongside the next reporting period.

 

19     Equalities Monitoring Information

 

Following the guidance produced by the Department of Health and the Department for Education and Skills, we must seek to identify who is making complaints to get a greater understanding of them. The following information was provided:

 

 Gender

 

2017 - 2018

2018 – 2019

2019 - 2020

2020 - 2021

2021 - 2022

Male

10

15

17

24

14

Female

25

26

64

29

27

Male & Female

5

3

0

2

1

Not stated

-

44

0

55

42

 

20     Who made the complaints

 

·        5 complaints were made by a child or young person via an advocate.

·        1 complaint was made by family or friends on behalf of a child or young person.

·        36 complaints were made by adults about the service provided to them.

 

The CGOM is aware most complaints about Children’s Services are not made by children or young people receiving a service.  To ensure that children are aware of and are supported to use the complaints and feedback procedure, the team works closely with the Children’s Rights team and where appropriate, other support and advocacy services and others making a complaint on behalf of a child or young person.

 

The council has a statutory obligation to offer advocacy support to any child or young person making a complaint and the Children’s Rights team make people aware of the options available for raising comments, concerns, complaints, and compliments and provide advocacy support to assist with this where requested.

 

The CGT are also available to attend meetings with staff members, children, and young people and on occasions foster carers to raise awareness of and understanding about how people can use the procedure.

 

21     Costs and Payments

 

The council has an obligation to ensure independence in the children’s social care complaints procedure. This includes a requirement for:

·        A person independent of the council to oversee all complaints at stage two made by children and young people.

·        To ensure the investigator at stage two has not had any involvement in the complaint or line management responsibility for the services being complained about.

·        To have a panel of 3 independent people at stage three.

 

These costs can be found in the section 6.

 

In addition to this the council provides financial recompense if, after a complaint has been investigated or as part of an LGSCO’s investigation, it is concluded that:

·        the LGSCO would find that there has been maladministration by the council causing injustice to the complainant; and

·        the LGSCO would recommend that financial recompense should therefore be paid to the complainant. 

 

Details of payments:

 

Delays in responding to stage 2 complaint and time and trouble having to pursue to Ombudsman. Time and trouble of having to pursue a complaint to stage 3

£100.00

Total

£100.00

 


 

22     Alternative Dispute Resolution

 

It is important to note that the Department for Education and Skills Guidance makes it clear that nothing in the procedure should preclude Alternative Dispute Resolution and that if agreed by both complainant and the CGOM, the council should explore this option.

 

Possible alternatives which may be considered by the CGOM include mediation, the opportunity to meet with senior managers, or the possibility of contributing to the review of policies and procedures.

 

23     Learning Lessons/Practice Improvements

 

The council is always happy to consider appropriate ways of resolving a customer’s complaint.  Some of the types of action the council has undertaken to resolve complaints have been issuing apologies, meeting with customers to hear their concerns and suggestions for improvements and putting these improvements into place.  This has been particularly relevant in the case of communicating effectively with customers and putting strategies into place to ensure that people are kept up to date.  The council also offers a re-assessment of needs where possible, to ensure that nothing has been missed or that circumstances have not changed.

 

Complaints provide senior managers with useful information in respect of the way that services are delivered.  The consideration of complaints has included the agreement to undertake the following actions, in addition to apologies and financial recompense:

·        Reminder to all staff of the importance of providing contact details to wider family members who are supportive of parents involved with Children Social Services, and the importance of recording the views of family members.

·        Held a lesson learned exercise for all frontline staff, to ensure that children in social care are provided with the necessary information and support when moving from children services to adult social care especially where issues arise in respect of allocation of social workers and drift is experienced.

·        Met with family to give assurances that their concerns have been heard.

·        Developed a communication plan with details about what can and what can't be shared.

·        Reminder to staff of the importance of sharing minutes of core group and case conference minutes with parents and carers in a timely manner.

·        Review of case file quality assurance procedures to ensure statutory social worker visits and diary notes to looked after or Child Protection casework is carried out and recorded correctly.

·        Development of a Pathway Plan

·        Reminder about the importance of good communication

Annual Adult Social Care Complaints Report

April 2021 to March 2022

 

24     Context

 

This report provides information about complaints made during the twelve months between 1st April 2021 and 31st March 2022 for adults under the Local Authority Social Services and National Health Service Complaints (England) Regulations 2009.

 

It is noted that several complaints related to delays and errors relating to assessments, reviews and care provision and charges.

 

Whilst there have not been many complaints about transition arrangements for people moving from children to adult services, the CGOM is aware of the concern, upset and frustration for complainants, these will cause. This is particularly the case where complaints have needed to be escalated to the LGSCO to be resolved. One complaint from this reporting period needed to be escalated to the LGSCO, the outcome will be included in the next reporting period (April 2022 – March 2023). However, this was upheld by the LGSCO. The Corporate Director of Adult Social Care and Integration is aware of this and is working to improve transitions planning and will liaise with managers in children’s services as part of this work.

 

All timescales contained within this report are for working days.  The structures for reporting have changed and are reflected in the reporting for adult service as shown in the below tables.

 

In addition, the numbers of compliments are also recorded were:

 

18/19

19/20

20/21

21/22

Be Independent

-

1

4

1

Commissioning & Contract Management

1

-

1

-

Community Provision

7

22

10

6

Joint Commissioning

-

-

-

-

Assessment

16

10

9

-

Care Homes

9

6

5

-

Mental health Safeguarding & DOLS

4

3

19

18

Learning Disability

-

-

-

1

Older People

-

-

-

11

The CGT are aware that many more compliments are received and actively work to encourage staff and teams to forward these to ensure they are recorded.  This is to ensure that we can provide a true picture of our customers’ experiences of the services they receive.

 

The compliments received included:

·        Thank you for assistance with process and support

·        thank you for your help with a housing application you were very helpful

·        Doing a marvellous job

·        Thank you for efforts regarding breakdown cost

·        Thank you for providing excellent support and been an absolute marvel

·        really appreciate social worker’s support

·        Helpful, clear, and thorough in how dealt with the issues

·        Really supportive, has been reliable and easy to communicate with

·        Thank you very much for all the care and attention

·        Thanks to Be Independent for call out services.

·        Thanks for help to assist relative to stay at home for so long and the peace of mind it has given

·        Thanks for being kind, caring, friendly, efficient, and professional, help has improved many lives

·        Thank you for help with shopping service, its marvellous and without this, does not know how they would have managed

 

The legislation makes it clear that people should be able to provide feedback and have this responded to without this being seen as a complaint. Therefore concerns, comments and requests are also logged.

 

Number of Concerns, Comments and Requests received

 

 

18/19

19/20

20/21

21/22

Be Independent

-

1

-

-

Commissioning & Contract Management

4

2

2

-

Commissioning Provision

-

-

2

 

-

Joint Commissioning

-

-

-

 

Assessment

3

10

2

-

Care Homes

5

3

2

-

Community Provision

8

8

3

7

Mental health Safeguarding & DOLS

11

9

5

9

Learning Disability

 

 

 

1

Older People

 

 

 

5

 

 

25     Who can make a Complaint?

 

Someone who:

·        The local authority has a power or duty to provide or secure the provision of a social service for him/her and

·        His/her need for such a service has (by whatever means) come to the attention of the Authority.

 

This definition also applies to a person acting on behalf of someone who meets the above requirements.

 

A complaint can be made by a representative where the CGOM receives permission from the eligible person, usually in writing, giving their permission for the representative to make the complaint on their behalf. A representative will also be able to make a complaint where the eligible person is not capable of making the complaint themselves, this includes when they have died.

 

The CGOM will decide if a person is suitable to act as a representative, if it is decided they are not acting in the eligible person’s best interests, they will inform them in writing of the reasons for this.

 

If a customer is not eligible under the terms of the Act, they will always be able to have their complaint looked at under the council’s 4Cs corporate complaints procedure.

 

26     Grading of Complaints

 

The Department of Health designed the following tool to assess the seriousness of complaints and decide the relevant action:

 

Step 1: Decide how serious the issue is

 

Seriousness

Description

Low

Unsatisfactory service or experience not directly related to care. No impact or risk to provision of care.

OR

Unsatisfactory service or experience related to care, usually a single resolvable issue. Minimal impact and relative minimal risk to the provision of care or the service. No real risk of litigation.

Medium

Service or experience below reasonable expectations in several ways, but not causing lasting problems. Has potential to impact on service provision. Some potential for litigation.

High

Significant issues regarding standards, quality of care and safeguarding of or denial of rights. Complaints with clear quality assurance or risk management issues that may cause lasting problems for the organisation, and so require investigation. Possibility of litigation and adverse local publicity.

OR

Serious issues that may cause long-term damage, such as grossly substandard care, professional misconduct, or death. Will require immediate and in-depth investigation. May involve serious safety issues. A high probability of litigation and strong possibility of adverse national publicity.

 

Step 2: Decide how likely the issue is to recur

 

Likelihood

Description

Rare

Isolated or ‘one off’ – slight or vague connection to service provision.

Unlikely

Rare – unusual but may have happened before.

Possible

Happens from time to time – not frequently or regularly.

Likely

Will probably occur several times a year.

Almost certain

Recurring and frequent, predictable.

 

Step 3: How to categorise the risk

 

Seriousness

Likelihood of recurrence

 

Rare

Unlikely

Possible

Likely

Almost Certain

Low

Low

 

 

 

 

 

 

Moderate

 

 

 

Medium

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

High

 

 

High

 

 

 

Extreme

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The CGT grades the complaints as:

Low            = Green     - Can be resolved locally

Medium     = Amber     - Needs a response from the Corporate Director

High           = Red         - Needs a response from the Corporate Director

 

Complainants are contacted by the CGT to design a complaints plan and agree an appropriate response timescale. This is often done through an acknowledgment letter requesting the complainant to confirm the council’s understanding of the complaint and the timescale for response.

 

Following the response, a complainant can ask the Local Government and Social care Ombudsman (LGSCO) to investigate if they remain dissatisfied.

 

27     Activity

 

The CGT recorded 42 complaints under the adult social care procedure during the year 2021 – 2022, compared with a total of 28 the previous year. 

 

In addition to the above there were three grade 1 and two grade 2 complaints about adult social care services made under the corporate 4Cs procedure.

 

Complaints are dealt with under the corporate 4Cs procedure when the complainant is not complaining with the consent of the customer, or it may be considered they are not complaining in the customer’s best interest.

 

28     Comparison with the preceding year

 

The figures show an increase in the number of complaints received in

2021 – 2022 through the adults’ social care procedures.

 

29     Outcomes of complaints:

 

 

2017 - 2018

 

2018 - 2019

2019 - 2020

 

2020 – 2021

2021 - 2022

Upheld

4

4

15

6

7

Partly upheld

8

11

12

6

13

Not upheld

6

5

16

13

17

Not proved

1

0

1

0

0

Not pursued

1

1

3

0

1

No response

1

0

6

3

4

Ongoing

0

0

0

0

0

Total

21

21

53

28

42

 

30     Response Times

 

A key requirement of the reform of complaints procedures is the importance of informing service users of the outcome of their complaints, in an appropriate time frame.

 

The Department of Health guidance on deciding how long it should take to respond to a complaint states:

 

If someone makes a complaint, your organisation has to acknowledge it within three working days. The person making the complaint will want to know what is being done – and when. However, accurately gauging how long an issue may take to resolve can be difficult, especially if it is a complex matter involving more than one person or organisation. To help judge how long a complaint might take to resolve, it is important to:

 

• address the concerns raised as quickly as possible

• stay in regular contact with whoever has complained to update them on progress

• stick to any agreements you make – and, if for any reason you can’t, explain why.

 

It is good practice to review any case lasting more than six months, to ensure everything is being done to resolve it.”

 

Details of Complaints

 

31     Green Complaints

 

There were 34 complaints graded as Green in adult services compared to 23 last year.

 

It is however noted 4 complaints received no response and the CGT are continuing to work with managers to ensure all complaints receive a response.

 

 Complaints graded at this level were categorised as follows:

 

BI                          = Be Independent                                    

CCM                     = Commissioning & Contract Management

Commis               = Commissioning Provision

Provision

JC                        = Joint Commissioning

A                           = Assessment

CH                        = Care Homes

Com                     = Community Provision

Provision

MH/S/DOLS        = Mental health Safeguarding & DOLS

LD                        = Learning Disability

OP                       = Older People


Green Theme of complaint

 

BI

CCM

Commis

Provision

 

JC

A

CH

Com

Provision

MH

S

DOLS

LD

OP

 

Total

Attitude of staff

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Disagree with Policy

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Disagree with Assessment

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

5

3

-

9

Discrimination

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Inappropriate Action

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

3

2

 

7

Lack of Action

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

4

1

3

9

Quality of Advice/ Communication

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

4

1

3

9

TOTAL

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

34

 

It is not uncommon for the category disagree with assessment to receive the most complaints. It is also noted many complaints relate to the quality of advice or communication. It is considered this is because of the work by the CGT to more accurately identify when complaints have arisen through lack of contact or poor quality of communication.

 

It is also noted that 4 complaints did not receive any response, which is an increase from 3 in the last reporting period. This is something which will continue to be brought to the attention of senior managers to assist with improving this for future complaints.

 

Green Response Times

 

BI

CCM

Commis

Provision

 

JC

A

CH

Com

Provision

MH

S

DOLS

LD

OP

 

Total

Within 10 days

-

-

-

-

-

-

4

9

1

5

19

Within 25 days

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

4

1

2

8

Over 25 days

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3

-

3

6

Not Pursued

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

1

TOTAL

-

-

-

-

-

-

5

16

2

11

34

 

It is important to remember that the legislation and guidance for adults does not prescribe actual timescales for responses. However, we do manage and monitor performance in this area using best practice across the different complaints’ legislation and guidance.  The above table highlights that we are responding to most complaints at this stage within the shortest timescale. However, it is noted that 4 complaints did not receive a response.

 

Green Outcomes

 

BI

CCM

Commis

Provision

 

JC

A

CH

Com

Provision

MH

S

DOLS

LD

OP

 

Total

Upheld

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

1

3

-

5

Partially Upheld

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

8

1

2

12

Not Upheld

-

-

-

-

-

-

3

5

1

3

12

No Response

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

-

2

4

Not Pursued

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

1

TOTAL

-

-

-

-

-

-

 

 

 

 

34

 

32     Amber Complaints

 

There were 5 complaints graded as Amber in adult services the same number as for last year.

 

Amber Theme of Complaint

 

BI

CCM

Commis

Provision

 

JC

A

CH

Com

Provision

MH

S

DOLS

LD

OP

 

Total

Attitude of staff

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Disagree with Policy

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Disagree with Assessment

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

1

Discrimination

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Inappropriate Action

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

1

2

Lack of Action

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

1

Quality of Advice/

Communication

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

1

TOTAL

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

4

-

1

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amber Response Times

 

BI

CCM

Commis

Provision

 

JC

A

CH

Com

Provision

MH

S

DOLS

LD

OP

 

Total

Within 25days

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

-

1

3

Within 65 days

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

1

Over timescale

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

1

Not Pursued

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

TOTAL

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

4

-

1

5

 

Amber Outcomes

 

BI

CCM

Commis

Provision

 

JC

A

CH

Com

Provision

MH

S

DOLS

LD

OP

 

Total

Upheld

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

1

Partially Upheld

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

1

Not Upheld

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3

-

-

3

No Response

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Not Pursued

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

TOTAL

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

4

-

1

5

 

33     Red Complaints

 

There were 3 complaints graded Red in adult services, compared to 0 last year.

 

Red Theme of Complaint

 

BI

CCM

Commis

Provision

 

JC

A

CH

Com

Provision

MH

S

DOLS

LD

OP

 

Total

Attitude of staff

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Disagree with Policy

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Disagree with Assessment

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

1

Discrimination

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Inappropriate Action

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Lack of Action

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

1

Quality of Advice/

Communication

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

-

1

TOTAL

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

2

-

-

3

 

 

 

 

 

Red Response Times

 

BI

CCM

Commis

Provision

 

JC

A

CH

Com

Provision

MH

S

DOLS

LD

OP

 

Total

Within 25days

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

1

-

-

2

Within 65 days

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

1

Over timescale

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Not Pursued

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

TOTAL

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

2

-

-

3

 

Red Outcomes

 

BI

CCM

Commis

Provision

 

JC

A

CH

Com

Provision

MH

S

DOLS

LD

OP

 

Total

Upheld

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

1

Partially Upheld

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Not Upheld

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

1

-

-

2

No Response

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Not Pursued

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

TOTAL

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

2

-

-

3

 

34     Equalities Monitoring Information

 

Following the guidance and best practice, it is important to understand who is making complaints and so we seek to identify who is making complaints.  Only the following information was provided:

 

Gender

Male:                             14

Female:                        28

Male and Female:        0

 

35     Who made the complaints

 

·        24 complaints were received directly from a customer

·        15 complaints were made by a family member

·        3 complaints were made by an advocate

 

36     Payments

 

The council provides financial recompense if, after a complaint has been investigated or as part of an LGSCO’s investigation, it is concluded that the LGSCO would find that there has been maladministration by the council causing injustice to the complainant with a recommendation that financial recompense should therefore be paid to the complainant.

 

Detail of payments made

 

Repayment of 12-week disregard costs

£761.01

Reimbursement and waive of care costs and time and trouble

£1513.77

Refund of overpaid care charges

£5886.00

Removed from invoice for care costs

£489.58

Total

£8650.36

 

37     Alternative Dispute Resolution

 

It is important to note that the complaints regulations and guidance for adult social care complaints are that a plan needs to be agreed between the complainant and the CGOM about how the complaint will be dealt with and responded to, what outcomes are wanted and what can be realistically achieved.

 

Possible alternatives which may be considered by the CGOM include mediation, the opportunity to meet with senior managers, or the possibility of contributing to the review of policies and procedures.

 

38     Complaints dealt with by the local authority and NHS Bodies

 

The CGT works with contracted agencies and statutory agencies to identify the main themes concerned in a complaint. Informal agreements are in place to provide the customer with a co-ordinated response with the agency responsible for the provision of the main areas of complaint taking the lead with co-operation from the other agencies as required.

 

39     Learning Lessons/Practice Improvements

 

The council is always happy to consider appropriate ways of resolving a customer’s complaint including meeting with customers to hear their concerns and suggestions for improvements and putting these improvements into place. 

 

The council also offers a re-assessment of needs where possible, to ensure that nothing has been missed or that circumstances have not changed.

 

Complaints provide senior managers with useful information in respect of the way that services are delivered, so that improvements can be made. The complaints manager is continuing to encourage work with teams across the council to ensure learning from complaints is leading to improvements in services and that evidence of actions being completed are provided. Some of the actions which have been logged include the following, in addition to apologies and financial recompense:

 

·        Introduction of an Autism training course for all social care staff working with customers on the Autistic Spectrum.

·        Change of worker

·        Reminder to staff of policy and procedure regarding the expectations of their professional engagement with customers and carers.

·        Allocation of a Review Manager to undertake the tasks required to understand the history of changes to the funded services because of the Covid-19 pandemic, accompanied by a reassessment of financial contributions.

·        Review and confirm that systems are in place to monitor performance where concerns have been identified

 

 40 Public Health

 

Complaints about services related to the functions of Public Health also fall under the legislation “Local Authority Social Services and National Health Service Complaints (England) Regulations 2009” and are therefore dealt with in the same way as those for adult social care services.

 

Compliments                                                     0

Comments                                                         6

Concerns                                                           1

4cs Corporate complaint at grade two           1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Annual Corporate Complaints Procedure Report

April 2021 to March 2022

 

41     Context

 

This is the sixth year we have produced an annual report for complaints considered under the Corporate Complaints Procedure. This procedure covers all complaints about services provided by the council where no statutory procedure exists.

 

There were 627 complaints at grade 1 in this reporting period compared with 502 last year.

 

The number of comments logged were 1326 compared to 1609 last year.

 

It is therefore considered the arrangements under the 4Cs procedure, introduced in the previous reporting period, and implemented in full in this period are showing consistent results in the assessment and grading of customer complaints and feedback.

 

We are pleased the implementation of the new procedure, has resulted in a significant reduction in the number of complaints which did not receive a response, as well as an improvement in the timescales for response.

 

We are continuing to work to ensure that every complaint is responded to. Those that did not receive a response were because of oversights. Additional measures have been implemented to reduce the risk of this reoccurring.

 

All timescales contained within this report are for working days.

 

In addition, the numbers of compliments are also recorded, and these are shown below for the directorates as they were known during the reporting period.

 

Number of Compliments Received

 

Directorate

2019 – 2020

2020 - 2021

Directorate

2021 -2022

CCS

51

34

Corporate Services

9

CEC

10

5

Customer & Communities

25

EAP

82

79

People

6

HHASC

63

64

Place

137

TOTAL

206

182

TOTAL

177

 

The CGT are aware that many more compliments are received and actively work to encourage staff and teams to forward these to ensure they are recorded.  This is to ensure we can provide a true picture of our customers’ experiences of the services they receive.

 

The compliments received included thanks for:

 

·        Man cutting grass verges is doing a great job

·        The waste team are always amazing - waving to make sure the lorry is seen in action

·        Thanks to the bin men for rescuing a hedgehog

·        Thank you to our recycling crew who have improved their handling of our collections

·        Thank you assisted collection was collected after reporting

·        Poo bins are plentiful emptied regularly. Thank you for this excellent service

·        Thanks for medical waste collection

·        Thanks to licensing staff, you made the process seamless

·        Thanks to housing maintenance and repairs really delighted with the workmanship and our service altogether.

·        Thank you to the team who came out to sort out a broken guttering down fall pipe

·        Repair man was very polite

·        Thanks to Gas repair staff on quick response and respect they showed customer

·        Thanks to Housing Options officer for her help and assistance

·        Thanks to Housing Options staff you've been amazing through out

·        Thank you to housing option team for providing help and advice

·        Thank you to Housing Adaptations team for help with adaptation

·        Thank you card for solution to noise issues

·        Thanks to NEO team for help with noise complaints

·        Thank you very much for all your help with my parking

·        To parking staff, help was invaluable

·        The car park attendant at Coppergate was really helpful

·        To Registrars a wonderful day. We both enjoyed every moment, and the service was truly exceptional.

·        Newly widened cycle/ footpath Scarborough Bridge has made such a difference

·        Thanks for bike paths being gritted

·        Gardeners cutting the grass in her area are doing a fabulous job, thank you

·        Thank you to the department planting the wildflower beds along the central reservation of the Hull Road

·        Thanks to council tax staff for being professional and patient making a positive experience.

·        Thanks for helping businesses out by channelling the grant and communicating so efficiently

·        Thanks for sorting out complaint so promptly

·        Thank you for how complaint was handled

·        Thank you noise team or amazing quick and efficient service

·        Thank you to city centre street cleaner

·        Thanks to street cleaner

·        Thank you for clearing the blocked drains in Boroughbridge Road

·        Thanks to streetlighting team for fixing an issue quickly

·        Thanks for changing streetlight

·        Thank to customer services for help renewing blue badge

 

The good practice from the statutory processes is clear that people should be able to provide feedback and have this responded to without this being seen as a complaint.  Therefore concerns, comments and requests are also logged in the 4Cs corporate procedure, and these are shown below:

 

Number of Concerns, Comments and Requests

 

Directorate

2019 - 2020

2020 - 2021

Directorate

2021 - 2022

CCS

179

309

Corporate Services

58

CEC

19

9

Customer & Communities

203

EAP

559

1056

People

3

HHASC

252

235

Place

1062

TOTAL

1,009

1609

TOTAL

1326

 

 

42     Who can make a Complaint?

 

The council’s corporate complaint policy and procedures states we will accept complaints from

·        a member of public or anyone acting on behalf of a customer with the proper authority and consent,

 

And using any of the following contact methods:

• in person

• by phone

• by letter

• by email

• through our website. www.york.gov.uk

 


 

43     Grading of Complaints

 

The CGT assess the appropriate stage to investigate a complaint or referral to the relevant Ombudsman, taking account of issues such as:

 

·        risk to the customer and the authority

·        severity of the risk

·        whether the issues in question are a one off, are a reoccurrence and likelihood of reoccurrence.

 

44     Response Times

 

It is considered good practice that a key requirement of a complaint procedure is the importance of informing service users of the outcome of their complaints in an appropriate time frame.

 

The new 4cs process for investigating and responding to corporate complaints was implemented at the beginning of this reporting period.

 

This changed the process from 3 stages to 2 grades.

 

The timescales have been changed to:

 

·        Grade One - 20 working days (10 for Housing Complaints in line with the Housing Ombudsman guidance)

·        Grade Two - 30 working days (20 for Housing Complaints in line with the Housing Ombudsman guidance)

 

In addition to the above all complaints under the 4Cs are investigated and responded to by the CGT.

 


 

Details of complaints

 

45     Grade One Complaints

 

Primary theme by directorate

 

2020-2021

 

Staff attitude

Disagree with assess - ment

Disagree with policy

Discrimination

Inapprop

riate action

Lack of action

Quality of advice, communication/work

TOTAL

CCS

2

36

12

-

10

12

16

88

CEC

-

1

-

-

1

1

1

4

EAP

4

18

44

-

64

140

29

299

HHASC

3

16

7

2

11

61

11

111

Total

9

71

63

2

86

214

57

502

 

2021-2022

 

Staff attitude

Disagree with assess - ment

Disagree with policy

Discrimination

Inapprop

riate action

Lack of action

Quality of advice, communication/work

TOTAL

Corporate Services

-

-

-

-

-

5

2

7

Customer & Communities

1

20

12

-

16

43

10

102

People

-

2

-

-

-

1

-

3

Place

4

38

79

1

54

298

41

515

Total

5

60

91

1

70

347

53

627

 

Outcome by directorate

 

2020-2021

 

Upheld

Not upheld

Partly upheld

Not pursued

No response

%*

Not Proven

TOTAL

CCS

20

43

16

4

5

63

-

88

CEC

2

1

1

-

-

-

-

4

EAP

145

79

43

8

20

7%

4

299

HHASC

20

32

37

12

9

8%

1

111

Total

187

155

97

24

34

7%

5

502

 

 

 

 

 

2021-2022

 

upheld

Not upheld

Partly upheld

Not pursued

No response

 

%*

Not proven

TOTAL

Corporate Services

1

2

3

-

-

-

1

7

Customer & Communities

34

45

14

9

-

-

-

102

People

2

-

-

1

-

-

-

3

Place

191

162

100

52

2

-

8

515

Total

228

209

117

62

2

-

9

627

 

%* are rounded up or down to the nearest whole number

 

Responding in time performance by directorate

 

2020-2021

 

In time

%*

Out of time

%*

Not pursued

%*

TOTAL

CCS

76

86%

8

9%

4

5%

88

CEC

2

50%

2

50%

-

-

4

EAP

250

84%

41

14%

8

3%

299

HHASC

71

64%

28

25%

12

11%

111

Total

399

79%

79

16%

24

5%

502

 

2021-2022

 

In time

%*

Out of time

%*

Not pursued

%*

TOTAL

Corporate Service

5

71%

2

29%

-

-

7

Customers & Communities

85

83%

8

8%

9

9%

102

People

1

33%

1

33%

1

33%

3

Place

353

69%

108

21%

54

10%

515

Total

444

71%

119

19%

64

10%

627

 

%* are rounded up or down to the nearest whole number

 


 

46     Grade Two Complaints

Primary theme by directorate

 

2020-2021

 

Staff attitude

Disagree with assess- ment

Disagree with policy

Discrimination

Inappropriate action

Lack of action

Quality of advice, communication/ work

TOTAL

CCS

-

4

4

-

4

3

1

16

CEC

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

EAP

-

10

5

-

22

49

4

90

HHASC

-

3

1

-

3

12

1

20

TOTAL

 

17

10

 

29

64

6

126

 

2021-2022

 

Staff attitude

Disagree with assess - ment

Disagree with policy

Discrimination

Inapprop

riate action

Lack of action

Quality of advice, communication/work

TOTAL

Corporate Services

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

1

Customer & Communities

1

9

5

-

7

3

-

25

People

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

1

Place

-

24

501

-

54

235

24

838

Total

1

33

506

-

62

239

24

865

 

Outcome by directorate

2019-2020

 

2020-2021

 

Upheld

Not upheld

Partly upheld

Not pursued

No response

%*

Not Proven

TOTAL

CCS

2

8

3

-

3

19%

-

16

CEC

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

EAP

46

19

14

3

8

9%

-

90

HHASC

2

6

5

1

6

30%

-

20

Total

50

33

22

4

17

13%

-

126

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021-2022

 

upheld

Not upheld

Partly upheld

Not pursued

No response

 

%*

Not proven

TOTAL

Corporate Services

-

-

-

-

1

100%

-

1

Customer & Communities

4

13

7

1

-

-

-

25

People

-

-

1

-

-

-

-

1

Place

657

102

33

44

2

0.2%

-

838

Total

661

115

41

45

3

0.3%

-

865

 

Responding in time performance by directorate

 

2020-2021

 

In time

%*

Out of time

%*

Not pursued

%*

TOTAL

CCS

11

69%

5

31%

-

-

16

CEC

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

EAP

65

72&

22

24%

3

3%

90

HHASC

6

30%

13

65%

1

5%

20

Total

82

65%

40

32%

4

3%

126

 

2021-2022

 

In time

%*

Out of time

%*

Not pursued

%*

TOTAL

Corporate Service

-

-

1

100%

-

-

1

Customers & Communities

20

80%

5

20%

-

-

25

People

-

-

1

100%

-

-

1

Place

685

82%

109

13%

44

5%

838

Total

705

82%

116

13%

44

5%

865

 

%* are rounded up or down to the nearest whole number

 

48     Learning Lessons/Practice Improvements

 

The council is always happy to consider appropriate ways of resolving a customer’s complaint including meeting with customers to hear their concerns and suggestions for improvements and putting these improvements into place. 

 

Most complaints logged at grade 2 as a disagreement with policy, are about the current policy of advising residents that the council will not pay for a replacement bin, when they report their bin has been damaged or gone missing after being collected.

 

Since the implementation of the 4Cs procedures, the CGT has worked with managers in waste services, which has identified that in many cases, for damaged bins, it has been caused by the wagons during emptying.

 

It also identified that in many cases, lost bins occurred because of bins falling into the wagon.

 

The current waste services policy means that when bins are reported damaged or lost, residents are told they must pay for a replacement. This means residents either must pay for a replacement or make a complaint to reach an appropriate resolution.

 

This creates additional time and trouble for members of the public, or costs for those who feel unable or unwilling to make a complaint. This is in addition to the additional work needed by council officers to respond to and resolve the complaints.

 

Most complaints about a lack of action relate to repeated failures with waste collections including assisted waste collections. It has been identified there were some difficulties with providing and using the technology for crew information and monitoring. Managers and staff in waste services have been working to resolve and improve the ability to identify and resolve problems and ensure collections take place appropriately.

 

Complaints provide senior managers with useful information in respect of the way that services are delivered, so that improvements can be made. The CGT is working with teams across the council to ensure learning from complaints is leading to improvements in services and that evidence of actions being completed are provided.  In addition to the above, some of the actions which have been logged include the following, in addition to apologies and financial recompense.

 

·        The parking team to check the counters on the carparks on a quarterly basis

·        Crew reminders and monitoring

·        Reminders to staff about access arrangements for assisted waste collections

·        Review of procedures

·        Repairs completed

·        Plans for frequency of updates and communication

As the council is committed to transparency and where there is no conflict or risk to the complainant’s interest or could compromise their anonymity, we have included the summary details of the LGSCO findings at Annex 1.

 

This is like how the LGSCO determines which decisions to publish.  For the decisions they do publish, they do not use real names.  You can search the LGSCO’s published decisions on the following link:

http://www.lgo.org.uk/decisions

 

49     Payments

 

The council provides financial recompense if, after a complaint has been investigated or as part of an LGSCO’s or HOS investigation, it is concluded that the LGSCO or HOS would find that there has been maladministration by the council causing injustice to the complainant; and would recommend that financial recompense should therefore be paid to the complainant.

 

Details of payments were made

To acknowledge the lost opportunity and avoidable time, trouble, and inconvenience – Ombudsman action

£300.00

For the avoidable distress the failures caused. This includes the anxiety suffered, the upset, the upheaval, the frustration, the inconvenience, and the impact on her mental health; and

Pay a contribution of towards the overall cost incurred when moving and preparing home.

For the avoidable distress the failures caused which have resulted in having to move from property 3 to another property.

Subject to providing satisfactory receipts, and will try to arrange for a community-based organisation to do the work

Subject to her providing satisfactory receipts contribution towards moving costs

For any improvement works to the existing fence, which already meets its empty property standard, subject to providing satisfactory receipts.

Ombudsman actions

£1,500

 

 

£1,293.60

 

£250

 

Up to £1,000

 

Up to £150

 

Up to £1,200 

The Council failed to collect Mr B’s bulky waste – Ombudsman action

£100.00

The Council is at fault for its failure to progress an application to stop up a section of verge on a road – Ombudsman action

£500.00

An unlicensed House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) – Ombudsman action

£100.00

To acknowledge its repeated failure to collect her bins and its failure to effectively monitor her bin collection as promised – Ombudsman action

£200.00

Recompense for additional heating costs – Housing Ombudsman action

£150.00

Reimburse cost of items removed. – complaint action

£50.00

Council failure regarding privacy in the decision notice for a planning application.

£100.00

Delays in updated HMO database – council agreed remedy to Ombudsman

£100.00

TOTAL

£6993.00

 

50     Alternative Dispute Resolution

 

Based on the good practice guidance in the statutory complaints’ procedures, the council also considers whether there would be an appropriate alternative way of resolving complaints, in the corporate procedure, rather than completing an investigation.

 

Possible alternatives which may be considered by the Corporate Governance Operational Manager include mediation, the opportunity to meet with senior managers, or the possibility of contributing to the review of policies and procedures.


 

Annex 1

Complaints received by the LGSCO

Category

Received

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

14/06/2021

Other

27/08/2021

Highways & Transport

02/02/2022

Adult Care Services

01/04/2021

Adult Care Services

04/06/2021

Education & Childrens Services

26/04/2021

Planning & Development

30/04/2021

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

04/05/2021

Planning & Development

12/05/2021

Adult Care Services

02/06/2021

Benefits & Tax

03/06/2021

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

04/06/2021

Education & Childrens Services

04/06/2021

Housing

09/06/2021

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

14/06/2021

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

16/06/2021

Housing

16/06/2021

Housing

17/06/2021

Corporate & Other Services

15/09/2021

Highways & Transport

30/06/2021

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

02/07/2021

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

02/07/2021

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

12/10/2021

Adult Care Services

19/07/2021

Planning & Development

27/07/2021

Planning & Development

26/07/2021

Adult Care Services

13/10/2021

Highways & Transport

09/08/2021

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

18/08/2021

Highways & Transport

18/08/2021

Housing

02/09/2021

Benefits & Tax

09/09/2021

Planning & Development

15/09/2021

Adult Care Services

16/09/2021

Adult Care Services

28/09/2021

Education & Childrens Services

30/09/2021

Corporate & Other Services

21/10/2021

Benefits & Tax

01/10/2021

Benefits & Tax

13/10/2021

Housing

14/10/2021

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

08/11/2021

Benefits & Tax

21/10/2021

Adult Care Services

27/10/2021

Highways & Transport

03/11/2021

Education & Childrens Services

13/12/2021

Benefits & Tax

09/11/2021

Housing

18/11/2021

Adult Care Services

17/02/2022

Highways & Transport

01/12/2021

Highways & Transport

09/12/2021

Corporate & Other Services

14/12/2021

Planning & Development

15/12/2021

Planning & Development

20/12/2021

Highways & Transport

21/12/2021

Planning & Development

11/01/2022

Education & Childrens Services

12/01/2022

Highways & Transport

14/01/2022

Highways & Transport

19/01/2022

Highways & Transport

20/01/2022

Adult Care Services

16/02/2022

Benefits & Tax

15/02/2022

Highways & Transport

16/02/2022

Highways & Transport

16/02/2022

Education & Childrens Services

17/02/2022

Education & Childrens Services

21/02/2022

Planning & Development

24/02/2022

Highways & Transport

04/03/2022

Highways & Transport

09/03/2022

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

10/03/2022

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

11/03/2022

Highways & Transport

13/03/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Complaints Decided by the LGSCO

 

 

Category

Decided

Decision

Decision Reason

Remedy

Service improvement recommendations

Housing

22/04/2021

Upheld

mal & inj

Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, Financial Redress: Quantifiable Loss, Procedure, or policy change/review, provide services to person affected

The Council agreed to carry out a review of its policies and procedures to improve: its systems and procedures to identify potential problems of perpetrators moving close to their victims; its consideration of discretion to prevent moves involving perpetrators who might end up living near their victims; its ability to be more proactive when known perpetrators do end up living close to victims; its record keeping; its investigation of reports of harassment; its consideration of discretion when rehousing applicants next door to tenants with violence and behavioural issues; its consideration of human rights.   

Highways & Transport

30/11/2021

Upheld

mal & inj

Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, new appeal/review, or reconsidered decision

   

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

18/06/2021

Closed after initial enquiries

Not warranted by alleged injustice

 

   

Other

27/08/2021

Incomplete/Invalid

Insufficient information to proceed and PA advised

 

   

Planning & Development

24/05/2021

Upheld

mal & inj

Apology, provide information/advice to person affected, Provide training and/or guidance

The Council will ensure it documents its decision-making process when deciding to close a case (for example a contemporaneous note if the decision arises from a group discussion).   

Planning & Development

24/09/2021

Upheld

mal no inj

 

   

Adult Care Services

30/06/2021

Upheld

mal & inj

Apology

   

Planning & Development

20/07/2021

Upheld

mal & inj

Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, Financial Redress: Quantifiable Loss

   

Highways & Transport

28/02/2022

Closed after initial enquiries

Not warranted by alleged mal/service failure

 

   

Corporate & Other Services

15/06/2021

Upheld

mal no inj

 

   

Adult Care Services

12/07/2021

Upheld

mal & inj - no further action, already remedied

 

   

Highways & Transport

19/05/2021

Upheld

mal & inj

Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, provide information/advice to person affected, Procedure or policy change/review

The Council agrees to: •Complete a review of its road adoption system. The review should consider how it is kept up to date and accurate. •After completing the review report the findings to Councillors and seek approval for changes and recommendations. •Once the Councillors have made their decision write to Mr B and explain what action it will take and what the timeframe will be for completion. •Provide the Ombudsman with a copy of the review report, agreed actions and timeframe for completion.   

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

17/09/2021

Not Upheld

no mal

 

   

Housing

21/06/2021

Upheld

mal & inj

Apology, New appeal/review, or reconsidered decision, Provide training and/or guidance

The Council will remind relevant staff to provide clear information in housing register decision letters about how to request a review of the decision. The Council will remind relevant staff to consider whether a complaint should actually be treated as a request for a review of a housing decision so the Council can respond appropriately.  

Adult Care Services

01/07/2021

Upheld

mal no inj

 

   

Planning & Development

11/08/2021

Closed after initial enquiries

Not warranted by alleged injustice

 

   

Benefits & Tax

20/04/2021

Closed after initial enquiries

Not warranted by alleged injustice

 

   

Adult Care Services

17/11/2021

Upheld

mal & inj

Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, financial redress: Loss of service

   

Adult Care Services

15/12/2021

Upheld

mal & inj

Apology, Financial Redress: Quantifiable Loss

   

Education & Childrens Services

26/04/2021

Referred for local resolution

Premature Decision - advice given

 

   

Planning & Development

30/04/2021

Referred for local resolution

Premature Decision - advice given

 

   

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

25/11/2021

Upheld

mal & inj

Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble

   

Planning & Development

18/11/2021

Upheld

mal no inj

 

   

Adult Care Services

17/08/2021

Closed after initial enquiries

No worthwhile outcome achievable by investigation

 

   

Benefits & Tax

20/07/2021

Closed after initial enquiries

26(6)(a) tribunal Other

 

   

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

15/07/2021

Closed after initial enquiries

26(6)(c) Court remedy

 

   

Education & Childrens Services

27/07/2021

Closed after initial enquiries

Sch 5.4 personnel

 

   

Housing

09/06/2021

Advice given

Signpost - go to complaint handling

 

   

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

13/01/2022

Upheld

mal & inj

Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, provide services to person affected, provide services/information to others affected

The Council should contact other residents who use the Council’s assisted bin collection service and have complained about missed collections since 1 April 2021. In cases where complaints have continued, the Council should: a) review whether monitoring has failed in their cases as well, and b) consider what steps it should take to acknowledge any distress caused.c) Those residents should be told they can take their case to the Ombudsman if they are unhappy with the Council’s approach.   

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

16/06/2021

Referred for local resolution

Premature Decision - advice given

 

   

Housing

16/06/2021

Advice given

Signpost - go to complaint handling

 

   

Housing

04/01/2022

Upheld

mal & inj

Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble, Provide training and/or guidance

•      Provide guidance to relevant staff to ensure they understand an RRO can only be applied for within 12 months of a relevant offence being committed. •      Remind its staff of the requirement to issue occupiers with a copy of a HAN. Additionally, the communication should cover the requirement to provide notice of an inspection at a property and to inform complainants who raise questions about fire safety that it has arrangements in place with the local fire authority, and not to just direct complainants to the fire service in these circumstances.  

Corporate & Other Services

22/11/2021

Closed after initial enquiries

26(6)(c) Court remedy

 

   

Highways & Transport

07/09/2021

Closed after initial enquiries

Not warranted by alleged mal/service failure

 

   

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

18/08/2021

Closed after initial enquiries

Not warranted by alleged injustice

 

   

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

18/08/2021

Closed after initial enquiries

Not warranted by alleged injustice

 

   

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

05/11/2021

Upheld

Injustice remedied during complaint processes

 

   

Adult Care Services

16/09/2021

Closed after initial enquiries

No worthwhile outcome achievable by investigation

 

   

Planning & Development

27/07/2021

Referred for local resolution

Premature Decision - advice given

 

   

Planning & Development

26/07/2021

Referred for local resolution

Premature Decision - advice given

 

   

Adult Care Services

25/11/2021

Closed after initial enquiries

26B (2) not made in 12 months

 

   

Highways & Transport

15/09/2021

Closed after initial enquiries

Not warranted by alleged mal/service failure

 

   

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

18/08/2021

Referred for local resolution

Premature Decision - advice given

 

   

Highways & Transport

24/09/2021

Closed after initial enquiries

Other reason not to investigate

 

   

Benefits & Tax

09/09/2021

Referred for local resolution

Premature Decision - advice given

 

   

Planning & Development

13/10/2021

Referred for local resolution

Premature Decision – referred to council

 

   

Adult Care Services

16/09/2021

Incomplete/Invalid

Insufficient information to proceed and PA advised

 

   

Adult Care Services

22/11/2021

Closed after initial enquiries

Not warranted by alleged mal/service failure

 

   

Education & Childrens Services

30/09/2021

Referred for local resolution

Premature Decision - advice given

 

   

Corporate & Other Services

02/02/2022

Closed after initial enquiries

Not warranted by alleged mal/service failure

 

   

Benefits & Tax

03/03/2022

Not Upheld

no mal

 

   

Benefits & Tax

13/10/2021

Referred for local resolution

Premature Decision - advice given

 

   

Housing

14/10/2021

Advice given

Signpost - go to complaint handling

 

   

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

25/02/2022

Not Upheld

No worthwhile outcome achievable by further investigation

 

   

Benefits & Tax

24/11/2021

Closed after initial enquiries

No worthwhile outcome achievable by investigation

 

   

Highways & Transport

09/12/2021

Closed after initial enquiries

26(6)(a) tribunal Other

 

   

Benefits & Tax

13/12/2021

Closed after initial enquiries

26(6)(a) tribunal Other

 

   

Housing

18/11/2021

Advice given

Signpost - go to complaint handling

 

   

Highways & Transport

24/12/2021

Closed after initial enquiries

26(6)(a) tribunal TPT/PATAS

 

   

Corporate & Other Services

21/01/2022

Closed after initial enquiries

Other reason not to investigate

 

   

Highways & Transport

27/01/2022

Closed after initial enquiries

Not warranted by alleged mal/service failure

 

   

Planning & Development

15/02/2022

Closed after initial enquiries

Not warranted by alleged mal/service failure

 

   

Education & Childrens Services

04/02/2022

Closed after initial enquiries

26(6)(c) Court remedy

 

   

Highways & Transport

14/01/2022

Referred for local resolution

Premature Decision - advice given

 

   

Highways & Transport

20/01/2022

Referred for local resolution

Premature Decision - advice given

 

   

Highways & Transport

01/03/2022

Closed after initial enquiries

Not warranted by alleged mal/service failure

 

   

Highways & Transport

29/03/2022

Closed after initial enquiries

Not warranted by alleged mal/service failure

 

   

Education & Childrens Services

17/02/2022

Referred for local resolution

Premature Decision - advice given

 

   

Education & Childrens Services

21/03/2022

Upheld

Injustice remedied during LGO consideration

Apology, Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble

   

Planning & Development

18/03/2022

Closed after initial enquiries

Not warranted by alleged mal/service failure

 

   

Highways & Transport

07/03/2022

Referred for local resolution

Premature Decision - referred to council

 

   

 

Abbreviations

Mal – maladministration

Inj – injustice

PA – person affected (customer/complainant)

Rep – representative for the PA

 

 

 

 

 

Compliance with Agreed Remedies

 

Category

Decided

Remedy

Remedy Target Date

Remedy Achieved Date

Satisfaction with Compliance

Housing

22-Apr-21

Apology
Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble
Financial Redress: Quantifiable Loss
Procedure or policy change/review
Provide services to person affected

22-Jul-21

22-Jul-21

Remedy complete and satisfied

Highways & Transport

30-Nov-21

Apology
Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble
New appeal/review or reconsidered decision

31-Jan-22

17-Feb-22

Remedy complete and satisfied

Adult Care Services

22-Feb-21

Apology
Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble
Provide information/advice
Provide training and/or guidance

05-Apr-21

07-Apr-21

Remedy complete and satisfied

Planning & Development

24-May-21

Apology
Provide information/advice to person affected
Provide training and/or guidance

21-Jun-21

07-Jul-21

Remedy completed late

Adult Care Services

30-Jun-21

Apology

28-Jul-21

29-Jul-21

Remedy complete and satisfied

Planning & Development

19-Jul-21

Apology
Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble
Financial Redress: Quantifiable Loss

20-Aug-21

14-Sep-21

Remedy completed late

Highways & Transport

18-May-21

Apology
Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble
Provide information/advice to person affected
Procedure or policy change/review

19-Aug-21

08-Sep-21

Remedy complete and satisfied

Housing

20-Jun-21

Apology
New appeal/review or reconsidered decision
Provide training and/or guidance

21-Sep-21

20-Sep-21

Remedy complete and satisfied

Adult Care Services

17-Nov-21

Apology
Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble
Financial redress: Loss of service

17-Dec-21

14-Dec-21

Remedy complete and satisfied

Adult Care Services

15-Dec-21

Apology
Financial Redress: Quantifiable Loss

14-Jan-22

17-Jan-22

Remedy complete and satisfied

Environmental Services & Public Protection & Regulation

25-Nov-21

Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble

25-Dec-21

21-Dec-21

Remedy complete and satisfied

Education & Childrens Services

21-Mar-22

Apology
Financial redress: Avoidable distress/time and trouble

21-Apr-22

22-Mar-22

Remedy complete and satisfied